Ottawa Maps Canada's News Deserts to Fight Misinformation
In a recent CBC News report, The Current convened a panel of journalists from across the country to grapple with a growing crisis: the spread of Canadian news deserts and the misinformation that fills the void. The discussion underscored what researchers and policymakers have long suspected — that as local newsrooms shutter, communities lose more than just their daily paper; they lose the connective tissue of civic life.
In a recent CBC News report, The Current convened a panel of journalists from across the country to grapple with a growing crisis: the spread of Canadian news deserts and the misinformation that fills the void. The discussion underscored what researchers and policymakers have long suspected — that as local newsrooms shutter, communities lose more than just their daily paper; they lose the connective tissue of civic life. For Canadians from rural Saskatchewan to the suburbs of Toronto, the question of who will cover city council meetings, school board decisions, and local environmental issues has become increasingly urgent.
Ottawa Maps Canada's News Deserts in Bid to Combat Misinformation and Restore Local Journalism
Ottawa, Ontario – August 2026 — The federal government is quietly building a comprehensive map of Canada's news landscape, a multi-year project designed to identify areas where local journalism has collapsed and where misinformation is most likely to take root. According to a December memo from Canadian Heritage obtained through access-to-information law, the department has "engaged a team of independent industry experts to develop a local news directory — a multi-phase, multi-year project that will ultimately measure the extent and spread of news deserts and areas of news poverty in Canada." The initiative is a direct response to stakeholder demands for better data, allowing Ottawa to target its policy efforts with surgical precision rather than broad, unfocused spending.
The Story — A Long-Awaited Data Project
The project addresses a problem that has vexed researchers for decades. A separate document prepared for the deputy minister of Canadian Heritage acknowledged that "the challenges of creating an up-to-date list of local news outlets at the community level have vexed researchers and policymakers for some time," noting that previous lists have been incomplete and prone to rapid obsolescence. The new directory aims to change that by using artificial intelligence to comb through data from Statistics Canada, Google, and other sources, identifying every local news outlet operating in Canada's roughly 5,000 municipalities.
April Lindgren, professor emerita at Toronto Metropolitan University's journalism school and one of the academics working on the project, said the reality on the ground is more nuanced than a simple map of black and white. "There probably aren't many absolute news deserts — places with no local news coverage at all," she said. However, she stressed that there are vast regions where news outlets are failing to meet the "critical information needs" of their communities. "Maybe they still try to cover all of those things, but the newsrooms are so diminished that it's very hit-and-miss what they pick up on," Lindgren explained, describing newsrooms so understaffed that coverage of municipal politics, local businesses, and environmental issues has become sporadic at best.
The first phase of the project, a proof-of-concept that cost the federal government $110,000, has already yielded sobering findings. A government spokesperson confirmed that the initial phase found "the decline of local news outlets is disproportionately affecting smaller, rural, and lower-income communities. The absence of local news leads to lower civic engagement, increased misinformation, and rising political polarization." The second phase will map news outlets in all communities across Ontario and Quebec, with a third phase set to expand the data set to the rest of the country by 2028.
The Investigative Journalism Foundation (IJF) is leading the technical work, using AI to perform a first pass that is then reviewed by a network of human verifiers, including local librarians. Max Hartshorn, technology manager at the IJF, said the computer program asks the AI "to basically make its best determination as to whether or not this website is a local news outlet for that community." After the AI produces a refined list of 40 or 50 potential outlets, human reviewers step in to confirm. Hartshorn noted a key advantage: AI is "capable of surfacing new outlets that our reviewers had no prior knowledge of, for example, small community and ethnic media outlets that fly under the radar."
Lindgren has been advocating for such a directory for years, not merely to guide government subsidies but to help Canadians locate dependable sources of local news. "It's getting more and more challenging for people to find reliable local news in this era of AI misinformation and disinformation and pink slime websites that imitate local news," she said. The problem is compounded by Meta's ongoing ban on news content on its platforms, which means Canadians no longer stumble upon local journalism while scrolling Facebook, and by AI-generated summaries that discourage users from clicking through to news websites altogether.
Canadian Context — A Crisis Decades in the Making
The decline of local news in Canada is not a new phenomenon, but the data now being assembled paints a stark picture. Lindgren's Local News Research Project, a crowdsourced map she runs, has documented that since 2008, 613 local news outlets have closed in 391 Canadian communities, while only 270 have opened and remain in operation across 196 communities. A study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, published in March 2025, found that 2.5 million Canadians live in a postal code with only one news outlet — or none at all. The same study documented a net loss of 11 per cent of print media outlets since 2008, including both newspapers and online publications, while private broadcast outlets experienced a net loss of nine per cent.
David Macdonald, who authored the report, highlighted a surprising finding: the urban areas suffering most from news deprivation are not remote northern hamlets but the suburbs of major cities, including Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal. "They have their own city governments, they have their own school boards, they've got hospitals, and they have almost no local news coverage," Macdonald said. About 25 news outlets are closing every year, and at the end of 2024, just over 2,900 local outlets were counted in Canada. "It's probably lower today," Macdonald added.
The federal government has not been idle in the face of this decline. Existing initiatives include the Local Journalism Initiative, which by March 2027 will have contributed $128.8 million toward the creation of local journalism, as well as the Online News Act and fiscal measures like the Journalism Labour Tax Credit. The new directory is intended to complement these efforts, ensuring that support flows to the communities that need it most rather than being spread thinly across the country. The government is currently seeking funding partners for the second and third phases of the project, with Canadian Heritage suggesting that Statistics Canada, the CRTC, and CBC/Radio-Canada could all contribute.
Impact on Canadians — The Cost of News Poverty
The consequences of news poverty extend far beyond a lack of daily headlines. Magda Konieczna, a Concordia University associate professor of journalism also working on the directory, said that as local news disappears or shrinks, "we see some of these societal impacts like loneliness, disengagement, mistrust." During the COVID-19 pandemic, she noted, "we saw how disinformation can fill those gaps when folks don't know where to look, when they don't trust the official messaging." The pandemic served as a stark demonstration of what happens when communities lose their trusted local sources: rumours spread faster than public health guidance, and official messaging struggled to reach the people who needed it most.
For Canadians living in news deserts, the practical implications are immediate and tangible. Without a local journalist attending city council meetings, decisions about zoning, property taxes, and infrastructure spending go unscrutinized. Without coverage of local school boards, parents are left in the dark about curriculum changes and budget cuts. Without reporting on local environmental issues, industrial pollution and water quality concerns may go uninvestigated for years. The erosion of local news also weakens the broader democratic fabric, as citizens who lack reliable information about their own communities are less likely to vote, less likely to participate in civic organisations, and more susceptible to polarizing national narratives that bear little relation to their daily lives.
The international community is watching Canada's experiment closely. There has been significant interest in the project from Australia and the United Kingdom, both of which face similar challenges in maintaining local journalism in the face of digital disruption. If Canada's AI-assisted directory proves effective, it could serve as a model for other countries grappling with the same crisis. The project also represents a novel public-private partnership, combining federal funding with the technical expertise of the Investigative Journalism Foundation and the academic rigour of university researchers.
Reactions and Analysis — A Tool for Democracy
Journalism scholars and industry observers have welcomed the directory as a long-overdue tool, though some caution that mapping the problem is not the same as solving it. Lindgren emphasized that the directory's value lies not only in guiding government support but in helping Canadians themselves navigate an increasingly fragmented media landscape. "It's getting more and more challenging for people to find reliable local news," she said, pointing to the rise of "pink slime" websites that imitate local news outlets while pushing partisan or corporate agendas. A reliable, publicly accessible directory would give Canadians a trusted reference point in an era of algorithmic confusion.
The project also raises questions about the future role of artificial intelligence in journalism. While AI is being used here to identify news outlets, the same technology is simultaneously contributing to the crisis by generating misinformation and discouraging readers from clicking through to legitimate news sites. The irony is not lost on the researchers involved. Hartshorn noted that AI's ability to surface small community and ethnic media outlets "that fly under the radar" is a genuine benefit, but he acknowledged that the technology is a double-edged sword. The directory's human verification layer, which includes local librarians, is designed to ensure that AI errors do not propagate through the system.
Konieczna framed the project in broader terms, arguing that local journalism is essential to social cohesion. "We see some of these societal impacts like loneliness, disengagement, mistrust," she said, linking the decline of local news to a wider crisis of community connection. Her comments echo a growing body of research suggesting that local news plays a unique role in binding communities together, providing a shared set of facts and a forum for public debate. Without it, Canadians are left to navigate an increasingly fragmented information environment where conspiracy theories and foreign disinformation can flourish unchecked.
What Happens Next
The immediate next step is securing funding for the second phase of the project, which will map news outlets across Ontario and Quebec. A government spokesperson said that "the Department of Canadian Heritage is currently assessing the second phase of the project," but no timeline has been announced for a final decision. The government is also in discussions with potential funding partners, including Statistics Canada, the CRTC, and CBC/Radio-Canada, though none have yet committed publicly. The third phase, which will expand the directory to cover the entire country, is scheduled for completion in 2028.
In the meantime, the crisis continues to deepen. With roughly 25 news outlets closing every year, the landscape that the directory aims to map is shifting even as researchers work to document it. Lindgren's Local News Research Project will continue to track closures and openings, providing real-time data that complements the federal government's longer-term effort. For Canadians living in news deserts, the directory cannot come soon enough — but it is only a first step. The harder work lies in translating the data into policy that supports sustainable local journalism, whether through direct subsidies, tax incentives, or regulatory changes that force digital platforms to compensate news organisations for their content.
The stakes could not be higher. As the CBC News report made clear, the erosion of local news is not an abstract concern for media scholars; it is a lived reality for millions of Canadians who have lost their only window into local democracy. The federal government's decision to map the problem is a recognition that you cannot fix what you cannot measure. But the map is not the territory, and the directory will only be as valuable as the policies it informs. For now, Canadians can take some comfort in knowing that Ottawa is finally paying attention — and that the quiet work of counting what remains of local journalism has begun.
By Alex Thompson, Staff Writer
This article was produced with AI-assisted research and editorial support. Reporting is based on sources cited in the article.
What's Your Reaction?
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Wow
0
Sad
0
Angry
0
Comments (0)